1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 445 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Suzuki | Honda |
Model | Fronte | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 785 cc | 1500 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |