1966 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2013 BMW X6
To start off, 2013 BMW X6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X6 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X6 weights approximately 1866 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X6 (610 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 578 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2013 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Suzuki Fronte | 2013 BMW X6 | |
Make | Suzuki | BMW |
Model | Fronte | X6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 360 cc | 4395 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 32 Nm | 610 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 504 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 2195 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 85 L |