1966 Toyota Corolla vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1966 Toyota Corolla is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Corolla. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Toyota Corolla | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Corolla | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1068 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
