1966 Toyota Corolla vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Toyota Corolla | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Toyota | Citroen |
Model | Corolla | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1077 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 61 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |