1966 Toyota Corona vs. 2012 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon (84 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corona. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corona.
Because 1966 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Toyota Corona | 2012 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Toyota | Lancia |
Model | Corona | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 84 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2390 mm |