1966 Toyota Crown vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 474 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 554 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Toyota Crown | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Crown | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2599 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |