1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 110 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Triumph 2000 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Triumph | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |
