1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Triumph 2000 | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Triumph | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | Herald |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 69.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 841 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |
