1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 1974 Seat 131
To start off, 1974 Seat 131 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1974 Seat 131. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1974 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1974 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Seat 131. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 1974 Seat 131 | |
Make | Triumph | Seat |
Model | 2000 | 131 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2500 mm |