1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1367 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Triumph | Dodge |
| Model | 2000 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2537 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 83 L |
