1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (138 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze weights approximately 237 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (200 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Triumph | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |