1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 164 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Triumph | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | Juke |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |