1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2013 Ford Explorer is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Explorer (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Explorer weights approximately 1039 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Explorer (475 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Explorer |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.8: 1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 2209 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5006 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2291 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1803 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |