1966 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 725 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Triumph | Lexus |
| Model | 2000 | RX |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 336 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2740 mm |
