1966 Triumph Spitfire vs. 1997 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 1997 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,147 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Spitfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Spitfire (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Spitfire should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 ZAZ Slavuta weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Triumph Spitfire.
Because 1966 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph Spitfire | 1997 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Triumph | ZAZ |
Model | Spitfire | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1147 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 725 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2330 mm |