1966 Triumph Vitesse vs. 1977 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1977 Zastava 2101 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 86 kg more than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph Vitesse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph Vitesse | 1977 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Triumph | Zastava |
Model | Vitesse | 2101 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2430 mm |