1966 Triumph Vitesse vs. 2012 Audi Q7
To start off, 2012 Audi Q7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 5,394 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q7 (493 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 2012 Audi Q7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q7 (1,000 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 842 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Triumph Vitesse | 2012 Audi Q7 | |
Make | Triumph | Audi |
Model | Vitesse | Q7 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 100 L |