1966 Wartburg 312 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (37 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 325 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Wartburg 312 | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Wartburg | Nissan |
Model | 312 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 900 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |