1966 Wartburg 312 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Wartburg 312 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Wartburg | Ford |
| Model | 312 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 900 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |
