1966 Wartburg 312 vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Wartburg 312 | 2010 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Wartburg | Audi |
| Model | 312 | A5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4625 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1382 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 65 L |
