1966 ZAZ 966 vs. 1999 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 1999 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,089 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 ZAZ Slavuta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 ZAZ Slavuta (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 ZAZ Slavuta should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 ZAZ Slavuta weights approximately 1 kg more than 1966 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 ZAZ 966 | 1999 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | ZAZ | ZAZ |
Model | 966 | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 887 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 54.5 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2330 mm |