1966 ZAZ Jalta vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 333 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ Jalta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (527 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
1966 ZAZ Jalta | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | ZAZ | Chrysler |
Model | Jalta | 300 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 887 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 527 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3340 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3048 mm |