1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 1959 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1967 Abarth 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac Brougham (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1665 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 1959 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 6380 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 75 L |
