1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Abarth 1300 (123 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 310 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Abarth 1300 (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1967 Abarth 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 77 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |
