1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1967 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1967 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
| Model | 1300 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4196 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3040 mm |
