1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (188 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 780 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3801 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |