1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 786 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2946 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1416 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |
