1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1083 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3425 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |