1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 930 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300. 2008 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1967 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1967 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1300 | STS |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4376 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 595 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 64 L |