1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1967 Abarth 1300. (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 699 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1967 Abarth 1300 has manual transmission. 1967 Abarth 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Abarth 1300 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3725 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |