1967 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Abarth 1300 (123 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 545 kg more than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Abarth 1300. (133 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Abarth 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1460 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |
