1967 Abarth OT vs. 1946 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1967 Abarth OT is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1056 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 1946 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | 62 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1866 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3280 mm |
