1967 Abarth OT vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1980 Seat Ritmo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Because 1967 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Abarth | Seat |
| Model | OT | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2460 mm |
