1967 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 152 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Because 1967 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 2003 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | OT | Ka |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 69 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 962 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |
