1967 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan
To start off, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Because 1967 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | OT | Grand Caravan |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1953 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3078 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 78 L |
