1967 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Abarth OT | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | OT | Malibu |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |