1967 Abarth OT vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 395 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Because 1967 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Abarth | Honda |
| Model | OT | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2436 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 40 L |
