1967 Abarth OT vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1048 kg more than 1967 Abarth OT.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Abarth OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Abarth OT | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | CTS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1858 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
