1967 AC 428 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 AC 428 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 AC 428 (345 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 AC 428 weights approximately 313 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 AC 428 (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 469 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1967 AC 428 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | 428 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 64 L |