1967 AC 428 vs. 1998 Ford F-250
To start off, 1998 Ford F-250 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 AC 428 (345 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1998 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford F-250 weights approximately 867 kg more than 1967 AC 428.
Because 1998 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 AC 428. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 AC 428 (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
1967 AC 428 | 1998 Ford F-250 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | 428 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3490 mm |