1967 AC 428 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 AC 428 (345 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 470 kg more than 1967 AC 428.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 AC 428 (626 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 1967 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1967 AC 428 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | 428 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7010 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 626 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 87 L |