1967 AC 428 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 AC 428 (345 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 1967 AC 428 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 AC 428. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 AC 428 (627 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1967 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 AC 428 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | 428 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7010 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 627 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
