1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 1750 | 62 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 79 L |