1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 132 kg more than 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 (186 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
| Model | 1750 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 186 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 64 L |
