1967 Alpine A 110 vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 606 kg more than 1967 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A 110 | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 110 | 2200 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 2227 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 81.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1181 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 56 L |