1967 Alpine A 110 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 691 kg more than 1967 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A 110 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2210 mm |