1967 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 633 kg more than 1967 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1967 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1967 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A 110 | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 955 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 132 L |
