1967 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1112 kg more than 1967 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A 110 | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Alpine | Lincoln |
Model | A 110 | LS |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 232 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |