1967 Alpine A vs. 1972 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1972 Chrysler Charger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chrysler Charger (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 1972 Chrysler Charger | |
| Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
| Model | A | Charger |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2680 mm |
