1967 Alpine A vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 390 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |